Alan Zendell, February 27, 2026,
People who fear Donald Trump’s attempts to undermine our democracy recognized from the start that our greatest vulnerability might be the 2026 midterm elections. This is not hyperbole or speculation. Trump has been very clear that he considers a Republican victory the only evidence of a fair election, which he self-righteously points to as a mandate to ensure that Republicans use any means to maintain their majorities in Congress. That’s the circular reasoning of an extreme narcissist who believes his only obligation is to his own beliefs.
Trump has a number of election-related weapons in his tool bag. The first is his ongoing campaign of lies, distortions, and outright fantasies about election fraud and his oft-debunked contention that Democrats have been rigging elections for decades, and it’s his mission to stop them. The only people who still believe that are either too stupid or lazy to look at the facts, or who, having invested their fortunes or political futures in Trump are too mired in self-interest to do the right thing although they know the truth.
It’s clear from recent polling that the lies no longer influence the vast majority of Americans. Human nature being what it is, once a life-long deceiver is revealed, there’s no going back. Once people see Trump for the self-absorbed sociopath he is, he loses them for good. That won’t stop the lies or the fanatical influence on Trump of the White Nationalist Stephen Miller who continues to have Trump’s ear daily, but that approach doesn’t have the effectiveness it once did.
Thus, Trump turned to gerrymandering, something entirely unsurprising, yet foolish. In doing so, he fell into the trap that often upends zealots and extremists. Openly trying to convert blue seats to red in the most extreme manner is the kind of overreach that offends serious, fair-minded people. It exposes Trump as willing to use any immoral ploy to achieve his aims, and Americans don’t like that. Moreover, the move was not properly thought out and overlooked some obvious flaws.
First, Trump’s influencers assumed that the courts would back their gerrymandering in red states but somehow block similar efforts in blue states. Which idiot came up with that idea? And the result, according to most respected pollsters, is a two-fold loss for Trump. Our largest states are now gerrymandered beyond any reasonable measure, and the result appears to have benefitted Democrats rather than Trump, because the strategy relied, among other things, on Hispanic voters continuing to support him despite ICE’s racial profiling which Trump and his appointees fully support.
The next ploy people feared was Trump creating a crisis so severe it would (1) distract voters from his other misdeeds, like the apparent withholding of accusations against Trump in the Epstein files, and (2) possibly provide him with justification for declaring a national emergency that would give him extraordinary powers that could include postponing or canceling an election. Thus, he has spent months engaging in belligerent saber-rattling with both allies and adversaries.
He hasn’t given up on acquiring Greenland from Denmark, one of our most reliable allies. He is attempting to take over the government of Venezuela, with the implied threat that he can do the same to any nation in our hemisphere that offends him. He is loudly threatening a war with Iran that his generals warn might have open-ended consequences beyond our control and result in many American casualties. Finally, he’s talking about forcing a regime change in Cuba. All this from a president who accused Democrats of involving the United States in endless wars.
Finally, there’s a draft Executive Order going around, written by some of Trump’s most extreme handlers that would declare a national emergency based on China allegedly planning to hack the midterm elections. The Order would be an attempt to wrest control of the election away from the fifty states, to which our Constitution grants sole control of it.
How serious is this? That depends on a number of things. There’s no question that an attempt to undermine our election process has existential implications for our republic. The Supreme Court can stop it in its tracks if it chooses to, and the recent decision ruling Trump’s tariffs unconstitutional suggest they may do that. Conservative Justices John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, and Neil Gorsuch are now on record as valuing the Constitution over Trumps political shenanigans. But we can’t put all our eggs in that basket. The midterms are the red line on which Americans of all races, colors, and political persuasions must stand firm.
Every American citizen must be willing to defend fair, open voting this year, which includes the right to vote by mail, and the right to authorize their states to enable early voting, neither of which has ever shown evidence of fraud or cheating. You can write letters demanding action from your elected representatives. You can support peaceful demonstrations. And perhaps most important and effective, you can break through the barriers we’ve erected to interpersonal communication. Engage with people, especially those who don’t want to discuss politics. Make them hear you.
If we bury our heads in the sand, Trump wins.