Alan Znedell, February 28, 2026
Our crack negotiating team of billionaires Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner have been talking to Iranian diplomats for months. Their discussions have been mediated by Badr Albusaidi, the Foreign Minister of Oman. When the Friday, February 27th talks ended, Albusadi told the international press that there had been significant progress.
This morning, after Israel and the United States launched coordinated attacks against Iran, Albusadi posted on social media: “Active and serious negotiations have yet again been undermined…[n]either the interests of the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this. And I pray for the innocents who will suffer. I urge the United States not to get sucked in further. This is not your war.”
It’s hard to know what message to take from that. Presumably, Albusadi was a neutral mediator whom both sides found acceptable, so there’s no reason to dismiss his obvious dismay that the attacks were launched as biased. Rather, as a representative of the smaller nations in the region, he was expressing the feelings of the millions of people in countries like Oman. Diplomats from those nations have worked tirelessly for years to help resolve our differences with Iran, only to see their own countries attacked by Iran in retaliation.
It’s no secret that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Natenyaho and Trump have been itching for this fight. It’s fair to ask, in hindsight, if the negotiations with Iran were always just a pretext for military action rather than a serious attempt at resolving anything. That’s not to say that Iran isn’t a potentially dangerous adversary that threatens the stability of the Middle East. Iran has been sponsoring terrorist groups throughout the region and threatening both Israel and the United States for forty-seven years, since the Shah was overthrown in 1979 by the radical Muslim regime that now rules Iran with an iron fist.
But that’s old news. There are a lot of opinions on all sides about how we’ve handled the situation over that time. The Iran Nuclear Deal that was negotiated in 2015 by the Obama administration was a typical example. In the fog of chaos that defines war and most diplomacy, there has never been a consensus about whether that deal accomplished anything. Most observers believe it at least slowed down Iran’s development of nuclear weapons, but there were many accusations that Iran was violating the agreement.
Trump muddied the waters by making Iran part of his hate campaign against Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He promised to trash the deal as part of his campaign for re-election. But his tendency to lie and exaggerate, and his total lack of integrity when it comes to balancing his responsibilities as president against the need to show the world how tough he is makes everything he said about Iran suspect. Combine that with the fact that both Trump and Netanyahu face severe opposition at home, and both badly needed a distraction to turn public attention away from their own questionable actions. Netanyahu has been under indictment for fraud for years, and we’re all aware of Trump’s history with courts.
Beyond those questionable motives for attacking Iran at this particular moment, with the Epstein files possibly about to erupt with accusations of sexual assault by Trump against a woman who claims she was thirteen at the time, we must also consider the remarkably strong influence Netanyahu has had on Trump. Netanyahu is a believer in preemptive strikes, which in the case of beleaguered Israel has made sense over the last eight decades. But does it make sense for the strongest military in the world?
The debate over whether and under what circumstances preemptive strikes are justified will probably never be resolved. But the fact that a majority of Americans have predicted and feared that Trump would involve us in a war to distract attention from his failures at home and possibly allow him to influence or cancel the midterm elections cannot be ignored. Trump has been a cheat and a liar for his entire life. Why would we believe him now?
The president who campaigned against Democrats he accused of perpetuating wars, who bragged that he ended eight wars that none of us even knew were happening, and who then demanded that he be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize has proved that he will do anything to stay in power. We’ve all seen that repeatedly. Now, he has demonstrated that he’s willing to start a war that can only be viewed as open-ended and unpredictable. The hubris required to assume that he can control the outcome when dozens of countries are involved is classic Trump. If military action against Iran is truly justified, it should be carried out by a coalition like the one George W. Bush and Colin Powell forged after nine-eleven.
Any other approach makes Trump’s motive suspect, and every American or foreign civilian casualty that results from this is on him. It makes a mockery of Trump’s Board of Peace, which so far appears to be nothing more than a fund-raising scheme for Trump’s empire. Far worse, Trump’s use of the military as his own personal toy opens the door for further aggression by Russia and for China to invade Taiwan. Is that the future you want for your children?