The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump

Alan Zendell, July 15, 2024

Assassinations are among the worst things humans can do. They tend to occur during periods of anger and divisiveness when tensions are already high – clichés about tinderboxes come to mind. In an unstable situation with persons of good will attempting to find common ground and a peaceful path forward, an assassination, either foiled or successful can tip the balance into chaos and massive bloodshed. I refer you to World War 1, which was triggered by the assassination of the Austrian Arch Duke and set the tone for all the death and destruction in the first half of the twentieth century.

Do you wonder what would cause a twenty-year-old kid with a fascination for guns and explosives to attempt to kill a presidential candidate? He had to know he’d be killed instantly by the Secret Service or local law enforcement. If he thought he’d die a martyr, he was wrong. Either young Mr. Crooks, the deceased assassin, was mentally ill, or he was obsessed with a deeply ingrained movement that is a real threat to our country.

Ohio Senator J. D. Vance, who might be announced as Donald Trump’s running mate this week, took to social media: “Today is not just some isolated incident. The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to President Trump’s attempted assassination.”

That’s a fascinating statement, one that Fox News began promulgating immediately after the shooting. Let’s try to parse it, together, and let’s try to put our biases aside and be objective. Vance’s first sentence is correct, although he meant to apply it to the level of anger that exists between the Biden and Trump campaigns, and I would prefer to apply it to the epidemic of mass shootings that have occurred in the United States. The anger in the campaigns was the catalyst for what Crooks did, but the culture that believes gun ownership should be completely unrestricted and that enables people on the fringes to feel entitled to use their guns any way they want to, is the more credible explanation.

Similarly, the issue of mental illness and the scarcity of health care resources which might have helped Mr. Crooks. And equally important, the destabilizing effect of unregulated social media. We live in a country in which for years, someone like Alex Jones was able to perpetrate the lie that the Sandy Hook shooting that killed twenty six people – teachers and children as young as six – was a hoax, until the courts finally caught up with him.

Vance also claimed that the central theme of the Biden campaign is that Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. Vance is right about that, but what he left out is that Trump has defined himself that way. Trump doesn’t have to call himself a Fascist or an autocrat directly when his actions speak for themselves.

Trump supporters don’t deny that’s what he is, and his most loyal supporters revel in the image of a strong leader unfettered by the Constitution or the Rule of Law. The most dangerous of them do things like surround state houses in Michigan and Kentucky and threaten Democratic Governors and their families. They also staged an insurrection at the Capitol, and told us afterwards that they believed they were following Donald Trump’s instructions.

That Mr. Vance’s statement is wholly disingenuous should not surprise us. After all, he wants to be Donald Trump’s Vice President. What better qualification could he have than practicing the Doublespeak his master is so adept at?
Vance is also correct that the rhetoric in the campaign undoubtedly affected the shooter’s view of the world. But you can look it up yourselves. It’s all documented in nine years of nonstop media coverage.

Only one candidate has been unrelentingly belligerent. Only one candidate campaigns with slanderous insults. Only one candidate pumps his fist in the air and screams fight. Only one candidate always fights to assure that no restricitions are placed on gun ownership and use. And only one candidate continuously advocates cutting back on mental health care benefits, especially Medicaid, which people of limited means depend on.

Every time we reel from the aftereffects of gun violence, the MAGA crew blames mental illness. But the same people have rejected every attempt by Congress to provide help for the people who continue to murder and maim. Trump pledged to increase mental health care funding after every shooting but went back on his word every time, just as he has always fought against restrictions on automatic and semi-automatic weapons like the one used to attempt to assassinate him.

We’re being told that as a result of his nearly being killed, Trump will present a softer gentler version of himself at the Republican Convention. Let’s see if he can pull that off for four days, but more important, how long it takes for him to revert to form.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New York Times on Trump

Alan Zendell, July 13, 2024

After his disastrous debate performance, the Times Editorial Board praised President Biden’s record, but urged him to drop out of the race for re-election and pass the baton to a younger generation. The Board said, “Mr. Biden has been an admirable president. Under his leadership, the nation has prospered and begun to address a range of long-term challenges, and the wounds ripped open by Mr. Trump have begun to heal. But the greatest public service Mr. Biden can now perform is to announce that he will not continue to run for re-election.”

The Times editorial said that despite his outstanding accomplishments in the last three-and-a-half years, the only compelling reason to believe that Biden is the best candidate to defeat Trump is that he beat him in 2020, but that Biden is not the man he was in 2020. They noted that Biden has correctly identified that what is at stake in November is nothing less than the survival of our Constitution and our democracy. They supported that goal, but concluded that the public perception of the president’s frailty after the debate made it likely that Biden would lose this time.

Yesterday, the Times dropped the other shoe. If Biden is no longer the man he was in 2020, Trump hasn’t changed except to feel emboldened and entitled to wreak havoc on anyone he perceives as an enemy – which equates to anyone who doesn’t take a knee and praise him. The Times made it clear that asking Biden to step aside was in no way an endorsement of Donald Trump. Rather it was an attempt to increase the chances that Trump would be defeated.

At the opening of yesterday’s Op-Ed, the Board spoke in simple direct terms:

HE IS DANGEROUS
IN WORD, DEED AND ACTION

HE PUTS SELF OVER
COUNTRY

HE LOATHES THE LAWS
WE LIVE BY

DONALD TRUMP IS UNFIT TO SERVE

The Times supported its opinion so perfectly, I’ll just repeat what they said, here. “Mr. Trump has shown a character unworthy of the responsibilities of the presidency. He has demonstrated an utter lack of respect for the Constitution, the rule of law and the American people. Instead of a cogent vision for the country’s future, Mr. Trump is animated by a thirst for political power: to use the levers of government to advance his interests, satisfy his impulses and exact retribution against those who he thinks have wronged him.”

Ther is no doubt that Donald Trump is unfit to lead, and I’ll go further.

Donald Trump is not fit to run a business that impacts the lives of other people. His company has already been convicted of decades of fraudulent practices, and his history shows that he will always maximize his own profit at the expense of everyone else, even if it leaves them in financial ruin. I refer you to Atlantic City, New Jersey and the people who enrolled in Trump University.

He is not fit to be around women unless they are armed or accompanied by a bodyguard because of his documented record of sexual assault and his complete disregard for women’s health.

He is not fit to be a husband unless you believe sleeping with a porn star while his wife is home caring for a newborn child is acceptable or you believe his remarks on the infamous Access Hollywood tape about openly molesting women qualifies him.

He is not fit to lead the United States or any other nation because he is a severely mentally ill sociopath with no moral compass and no regard for either the people or the oath he takes to defend the Constitution. Oaths and promises mean nothing to Trump unless they suit his convenience.

The only thing Donald Trump is fit for is a prison cell.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Should Biden Quit?

Alan Zendell, July 12, 2024

President Joe Biden is 81 and suffers from neuropathy, which is the reason he looks stiff when he walks. Neuropathy can greatly reduce sensation in legs and feet. I’m 81 too, and I also suffer from neuropathy. Some days, if you saw me walking, you might think I was a feeble old man about to collapse. The fact that you’re reading this demonstrates that that has nothing to do with my cognitive ability.

Until they reach eighty, most people have no idea what aging is really like. Put ten octogenarians in a room, and each of them will likely report that some part of their body doesn’t work the way it should. They’ll also likely tell you that everything else works just fine. I was as horrified as everyone else when Biden appeared to lose himself at the debate with Donald Trump. But two weeks later, the polls reflecting Biden’s worst moments haven’t really changed, and as I’ve contended for months, there’s no reason to have confidence in them, anyway.

I’ve followed Biden’s career for fifty years, and always admired his commitment to public service and all Americans in the lower 99 percent. But even I was on the fence about whether he should quit. Simply put, nothing, not Joe Biden’s legacy, not Kamala Harris’ ambition, not whether Biden occasionally trips over a word (I did it twice, today) matters more than preventing Donald Trump from destroying our country.

As Biden said at his press conference Thursday night, show him evidence that he can’t beat Trump and someone else can and he’ll retire. His first term has been a marvel of accomplishment. When the history of the aborted MAGA era is written, people will look back on Biden the way my generation revered Harry Truman. All the noise and bluster from Trump can’t negate Biden’s obvious successes. Every significant economic measure and index is soaring, with equity markets at record levels and unemployment still at twenty year lows.

Ignore the pundits for a while – they don’t matter, because the only two people who could convince Biden to step aside are his wife and Nancy Pelosi, who is older than he is. The Democrats who have said he shouldn’t run have told us they’ve been listening to their constituents, which means they were afraid Biden might cost them their own seats. Wait a few days until those same constituents weigh in about Thursday night and see if some of those nervous House members change their minds.

In the meantime, here are a few things to reflect on. Governor Greg Abbott of Texas has spent his entire time in office governing from a wheelchair. President Franklin Roosevelt governed us through the Great Depression and World War 2 from a wheelchair. Senator John McCain served with one arm disabled. Illinois Senator Tammy Duckworth has no legs. Biden isn’t what he used to be – neither am I – are you? The leaders of the nearly forty countries who attended this week’s NATO conference laud Biden and consider the possibility of another Trump presidency an existential crisis. Did any of them suggest that he shouldn’t run?

Biden’s campaign is in crisis, but his press conference convinced me of two things: he’s up to the job, and if at some point in the next four years he feels he isn’t any longer, Kamala Harris will be a more than adequate steward of his legacy. I wonder if Harry Truman is watching from the great beyond.

The media are so obsessed with their feeding frenzy, they’re overlooking the elephant in the room. Americans have not yet fully assimilated what it means to have a candidate running for president who is a convicted felon and who has been found by two courts to have been running his business as a criminal enterprise. Millions of voters held their noses and voted for Trump because they knew Republican majorities in Congress would pass a huge tax cut, and Trump would sign it. They knew he was an immoral sociopath, but they just couldn’t vote for another Clinton. Next time around, the stench was too great, and he lost.

When the fury over the debate dies down, if Biden continues to do what he did at his press conference, and videos of Trump inciting insurrection flood the airways with excerpts from Project 2025, voters will grasp the danger and reject him soundly. Millions of people let themselves be seduced by a con man, but faced with the reality of what Trump intends, Americans will realize what a sick romance they got involved in.

I understand why Biden won’t quit, and I commend him for it. I also believe he will save the country from Trump – again. You may not love Biden, but at least you don’t have to wear a HAZMAT suit when you’re near him.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Donald Trump’s Mental Health

Alan Zendell, July 6, 2024

The past couple of weeks have seen a media frenzy around President Biden’s mental fitness to serve a second term. It stemmed from his awful debate performance during which he often seemed confused and unable to speak coherently. It was chilling, and the attention paid to Biden’s mental acuity is not unreasonable.

On the other hand, the days of scrutiny over the health of Biden’s brain also illustrates another, subtly sinister issue. There were two people on that debate stage, neither of whom performed like someone we want leading our country, but Donald Trump got a free pass. What makes that so concerning is that it is part of a pervasive pattern that has existed for nine years.

From the moment he walked down the escalator in Trump Tower, Trump was a media sensation. He had always craved being a celebrity, and he loved nothing more than huge audiences paying obeisance to him. He was good for ratings, so every news network that relied on happy sponsors gave him as much air time as they could. The public is so used to Donald Trump’s outrageous behavior, the media just treat it as normal – but it’s not.

The Biden-Trump debate demonstrated two aspects of Donald Trump’s mental health that we’re so used to, most people now take them for granted. That has to stop, and the media must accept responsibility for creating at least part of the Trump monster who threatens our future today.

One is a very serious mental health condition known as Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD.) The other is mental acuity. As I’ve noted in earlier posts, the American Psychological Association’s website defines NPD in terms any lay person can understand. It also lists the nine most common symptoms of NPD. People who suffer from NPD:

    • Have a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerate achievements and talents).
    • Are preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love.
    • Believe that they are “special” and can only be understood by other special or high-status people.
    • Require excessive admiration.
    • Have a sense of entitlement (i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment).
    • Take advantage of others to achieve their own ends.
    • Lack empathy or are unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others.
    • Are often envious of others or believe that others are envious of them.
    • Show arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.

Can you think of a better description of Donald Trump? His niece, clinical psychologist, Mary Trump has frequently asserted that her uncle Donald is severely mentally ill, and that should concern all of us. Recently, she also told the media that his claims of physical fitness and health are lies, and that if the public knew how unhealthy he really was, they would be shocked.

PSD symptoms are more than just personality traits. Recent research has linked them to a number of psychotic behaviors, finding that NPD sufferers have “a cognitive bias in which individuals tend to attribute the causes of events or outcomes to external factors or circumstances rather than internal factors related to themselves.” That might explain why Trump cannot let go of the fantasy that he won the 2020 election.

The researchers also linked NPD to other psychotic behaviors including “the need to control thoughts, subjective cognitive complaints, and the use of fantasizing as an emotional regulation strategy.” Donald Trump is mentally ill.

Trump also exhibits serious symptoms of cognitive decline. They’re not as striking as the problems Biden exhibited because Trump is skilled at making them seem like part of his act. Trump cannot string ten words together if he’s not reading from a teleprompter – he seems unable to construct a complete English sentence. He forgets people’s names, confuses countries with each other, and he rambles incoherently. He also invents idiocies like swallowing bleach to cure COVID, and he lies so consistently, it’s not clear he even knows what the truth is.

Check out the links above and draw your own conclusions. All this leaves me with one question. Would you rather be led by someone who sometimes trips over words but has been respected by his peers in Congress and by foreign leaders around the world for fifty years, or someone like Trump who has no respect for the rule of law and marks every negative box on the mental health checklist?

It’s time the media started covering Trump responsibly. In a very real way, they have been drawn into Trump’s transactional fantasy world, in which everything is evaluated in terms of money and power. And it’s not just right-wing media – even gold standards like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal are guilty of it. That’s because they all answer to the same breed of corporate masters who fill Trump’s coffers and supply the $$ that keep the media solvent. It’s an unholy partnership that may destroy us.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Has It Already Begun?

Alan Zendell, July 5, 2024

If you haven’t heard of Project 2025, it’s in your interest to learn about it. The brainchild of the ultra-Conservative Heritage Foundation, it lays out a blueprint for a Trump administration whose objective is to transform America into a “Christian Democracy” using Viktor Orban’s re-making of Hungary as a model. It’s a thousand-page document that lays out how Conservatives will govern America. Donald Trump claimed, yesterday, that he knows nothing about Project 2025. Raise your hand if you believe that.

Project 2025 builds on the usual Conservative tropes: family values, individual rights, defending our sovereignty, and destroying the administrative state. It sounds benign enough until you read between the lines. Family values means marriage only between a man and a woman and the repeal of any recognition of LBGTQ rights, removing all references to non-binary genders from educational materials, statutes, and regulations. Individual rights is probably the most disingenuous subtitle in Project 2025 because it focuses mostly on the rights of fetuses, (outlawing abortion,) and the right to own and use any kind of weapon you want to.

Sovereignty is a code word for our southern border and includes every slander ever uttered by Donald Trump about immigrants and refugees. Finally, destroying the administrative state means firing a large percentage of the two million people who work for the federal government, who are covered by the Hatch Act which requires their actions to be nonpartisan. Project 2025 would replace those who remain entirely with loyalists, which sounds a lot like the origins of the Gestapo to me.

I omitted religious values above because I want to focus on them here. I happened to be in Budapest the day in 2015, four months after Donald Trump’s escalator ride, when thousands of Syrian refugees arrived and were held captive at the Budapest railway station. That day, Orban addressed his nation to justify his action, declaring that Muslims were not welcome in Hungary, which he intended to transform into a white, Christian nation. The local press referred to him as “the Hungarian Donald Trump.”

We’ve seen the beginning of that trend already in the United States as MAGA-dominated legislatures have begun passing laws that were likely drafted by the Heritage Foundation. Florida has a new law that requires all references to gay or transgender issues removed from all regulations and official documents. Louisiana now requires the Ten Commandments to be posted and taught in all elementary schools. A few years ago, I would have said we have to wait until the Supreme Court weighs in on whether that’s constitutional, but the Court we inherited from Trump is likely to rubber stamp it. And twenty red states have essentially outlawed abortion.

It’s understandable that with all the turmoil and divisiveness Trump has created, if you don’t live in either of those states, you might not want to get involved, but those actions represent an ominous trend that we must take seriously, and something I saw yesterday sent a chill up my spine that’s still there today.

My wife loves fireworks, so we spent Independence Day evening channel surfing to see which network had the best presentation. PBS did its usually creditable job producing A Capital Fourth, a live, patriotic musical show from the Capital Mall in Washington, not exactly my thing, but well-done and appropriate. CNN bounced from city to city showing viewers how the Fourth was celebrated around the country – rich in pop culture but not so much on fireworks. So we fell back on the old standard: NBC’s production of the Macy’s firework show over the Hudson River in New York.

As always, the fireworks were accompanied by a musical review, this one atop a New York skyscraper. The fireworks were spectacular, lighting the sky between New York and New Jersey – for about five minutes. Apparently, NBC thought that millions of viewers who tuned in looking for fireworks would rather listen to a concert. The band was outstanding and many of the performers, like Alex Newell, were brilliant, but after a few musical numbers, they started performing Christian hymns.

Performed well, Amazing Grace is an impressive piece of music, but it was absolutely inappropriate as a celebration of Independence Day. Even more so were the hymns that followed it. It was outrageous and offensive. Not a hint of the traditional patriotic songs emanating from Washington on PBS, with John Philip Sousa nowhere to be found.

I don’t know whether Macy’s or NBC was responsible, but my question to both of them is: “What the hell were you thinking?” I learned a long time ago that most of the time when we suspect someone of having an ulterior motive, it turns out they were just stupid or incompetent. But I can’t help but wonder – was NBC or Macy’s anticipating a Trump victory and deciding to present the appearance of being on board with Project 2025?

If that’s true, we’re doomed.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Not Your Parents’ Independence Day

Alan Zendell, July 4, 2024

My father was one of the last men to be drafted and one of the last to return from combat in France. He missed the famous celebration in Times Square and he never appeared in a newsreel kissing a pretty girl after disembarking from his ship in 1946. The flush of victory had passed, and America was dealing with a vast restructuring of its workforce, while wrestling with our new role as leader of the Free World. We had been an isolationist nation before the war, but now, we were about to take on the mantle of savior of our allies who suffered far more destruction during the war than we did.

My first memory of seeing my father was when he secured a weekend pass from Fort Dix to surprise me at my third birthday party. My next memory was standing with him and seeing him tear up on Eastern Parkway in Brooklyn watching his battalion march in the Independence Day parade. I didn’t grasp the symbolism of seeing the troops and bands marching to Grand Army Plaza, which was modeled after the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, but I felt the enormous pride and exultation of the crowd, and I knew I was experiencing something special.

I didn’t understand that he and millions of his fellow veterans had come back to a serious economic recession. He pumped gas for two years to put food on our table. By the time I was five, every kid in America knew children in Europe were still starving. Our parents told us so every day and instilled in us the need to conserve and never waste a crumb. I didn’t understand the politics that resulted in the Marshall Plan, but I knew we were feeding the nations of Europe until they recovered from the devastation of the war.

That’s what Independence Day meant to me, then. We no longer have to feed our allies, but the basic idea of our leadership in a world that had almost been destroyed by the war has lived with me ever since. The year the Berlin Airlift began, the nation of Israel was created, and was immediately at war with neighbors who vastly outnumbered it and vowed to wipe it off the face of the earth. The following year, the Soviet Union exploded its first atomic bomb and the Cold War began.

My father and I watched the parade every year. By the time we entered the Korean conflict, I was a patriotic American who believed our nation was unique in history and the best hope for a world in which everyone could live in peace and prosperity. That sounds hopelessly naïve, but I was only eight, and that’s what everyone told me.

Seventy years later, I look at the world and see frightening echoes of the past. The brutality of Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler’s lust to dominate Europe while murdering millions of innocent civilians resonate with Vladimir Putin’s obsession to recreate the Soviet Union. And the war between Israel and its neighbors still rages after seventy-six years, as dangerous today as ever.

More chilling is the political change we’re seeing around the world. In America, the decades since World War 2 witnessed a steady increase in human rights and the ability of millions to escape poverty and live the American dream. In 2008, we elected a black president! We thought we’d turned a corner in maturing as a nation, but many of us became complacent and forgot that liberty and democracy are not free. We ignored the cries of those who still felt oppressed and looked the other way when our veterans were largely abandoned by our government. We pretended that survivalist armies living off the grid and neo-Nazi and White Supremacy groups were just fringe elements that made good subjects for Hollywood screenplays.

We were wrong. It turned out that America had not become the kinder, gentler place we thought it had. All we’d accomplished was driving the forces of division and dissolution underground, festering and smoldering, awaiting the arrival of a demagogue to unite and enable them. History has proved that whenever a power vacuum exists, either a savior or a destroyer will show up to fill it. We forgot that the trappings of modern civilization didn’t replace but simply papered over the law of the jungle we evolved from. We let our guard down, and now fascist movements are growing all over the world.

You thought it couldn’t happen here? You thought Donald Trump was all bluster? Did you, like the rest of us, assume that our democracy and our Constitution were sacrosanct? Today is July 4, 2024, a critical time to reflect on what that means. It’s not just burgers, hot dogs, ribs, and watermelon as my friend Stan remarked, yesterday.

Everything we fought and died for in 1776 is at risk today. I hope Joe Biden can still do the job he was elected to do in a second term, but if he can’t, we must realize that defeating Trump is as serious an existential crisis as the Civil War was. Think hard about Independence Day, because this could be the last one that reflects life as we know it in America.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Court’s Presidential Immunity Decision Changes Everything

Alan Zendell, July 2, 2024

Before yesterday’s Supreme Court decision that presidents performing “official duties” are immune from criminal prosecution, the contrast between Joe Biden and Donald Trump was already starkly evident. Both men have been clear about their ideologies and values. We don’t need another debate to define who they are and how they want to govern.

Joe Biden has been a staunch supporter of labor and the middle class, and of social and economic justice and opportunity. He believes in the inscription on the Statue of Liberty: Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. As Senator, Vice President, and President, he consistently stressed our need to be united in defense of our allies against military threats from Russia, Iran, China, and North Korea. Most important, he has always been an unabashed patriot and defender of democracy and the rule of law.

Donald Trump has consistently favored the interests of wealthiest Americans and pandered to right-wing fringe groups, racists, and religious extremists. He has demonstrated disdain and disrespect for our military leaders, and promised to use the Office of the President as a weapon against his political opponents. Playing on the smug ambitions of people like Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, he stacked the Supreme Court with the most conservative, extremist majority it has ever had. He routinely courts favor from murderous dictators while threatening to abandon our allies and dismantle NATO. Most important, he has no respect for either truth or the rule of law and has explicitly asserted that presidents can do anything they wish with complete immunity from criminal prosecution.

As I read the last two paragraphs, the choice for Americans who love their country is so clear, it makes my head spin that so many of us have been taken in by Trump’s self-serving claims of making America great again. No nation has ever been close to perfect, but until Trump came along, few questioned that America was as close to that ideal as any country has ever been, as well as the country most feared by its enemies. Trump has done nothing but tarnish that image and weaken us. To him, making America Great (again?) is simply Orwellian Doublespeak.

The Supreme Court’s decision granting a president full immunity for any action performed during the official duties of the office changes the game completely. The arguments about which president is the greater threat to democracy were rendered meaningless by the Court. Trump is very clear about his intentions to grab and hold as much power as he can, and the Supreme Court has made it far more likely that if he is re-elected, there will be few if any legal barriers to achieving his fascist-style ambitions. Rather than fortify the Constitution, the Court has turned the possibility that another Trump presidency could destroy our democracy into a likelihood.

There has not been such a stark difference in presidential candidates since the Civil War, yet Trump and our profit-oriented media seem to have successfuly made the coming election about which old man will be the last one standing. That’s the choice our flawed political system has given us, but it has little to do with what’s really at stake. Before the decision on presidential immunity, the arguments about the future of our fragile democracy were hypothetical. The Court made them urgent and immediate.

The Supreme Court left the argument over what constitutes the official duties of the president to be worked out by lower courts, after which SCOTUS itself will decide if they got it right. The first obvious conclusion we can draw from that is that we will have no clear definition of presidential duties before Election Day, so we can safely assume that if Trump is re-elected, he will take office with every intention of using his presumed immunity to neutralize his opposition the way Vladimir Putin dealt with Alexei Navalny.

The more sinister conclusion is that if, as many observers believe, the Court’s intention is to help Trump achieve his ends, it will be virtually impossible to convince the right-wing majority that anything Trump does incurs criminal liability. And there’s a particularly nasty irony in that, since in the past, three of the most conservative Justices (Roberts, Alito, and Kavanaugh) wrote that it is a fundamental tenet of our democracy that no one including a president is above the law.

It’s extremely unlikely that either Biden or Trump will drop out of the race. Thus, our choice isn’t about age or hoping Biden is up to the challenge of another term. It is plainly and simply about whether a fringe group of extremists is going to be allowed to trash the legacy of the American dream, and whether our grand experiment in democracy will simply result in scholarly works about The Rise and Fall of America.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Donald Trump Could Be the Salvation of Biden’s Candidacy

Alan Zendell, July 1, 2024

The country has had ten days to absorb the impact of the train wreck CNN called a debate. The shock, many would say horror of seeing President Biden wilt under the scripted avalanche of lies and dystopian fantasies thrown at him by Donald Trump has eased. At the same time, we’ve come to understand the nature of what Trump did, and that has reinforced our view of how dangerous he is.

The debate was supposed to be about policies and visions of America’s future. If there was a major failure in the Biden camp’s preparation, it was naively assuming that the other side viewed it that way. They should have known better – we all should have, and we have every right to expect more from Biden’s staff and from Biden himself.

The morning after the debate, I, like millions of Biden supporters thought his campaign had suffered a mortal blow. It always feels that way when a tornado tears through your town or the road you take to work is under water from a cataclysmic flood. But then the sun comes out, the insurance adjuster shows up, and we pick ourselves up and get to work rebuilding and restoring. Even after tragic losses, the survivors pick up the pieces and assess their priorities.

That’s where our nation is, especially the part that hoped Biden could handle the monumental tasks of campaigning and serving four more years as president. No one can know with certainty whether he can, but what is coming to the fore is the reality of the alternative. We know exactly who Donald Trump is and what he intends to do.

With a friendly Supreme Court, were he to be re-elected with majorities in both houses of Congress, there is a realistic possibility that he will bring down the institutions on which our country has depended for stability for more than 200 years. He is capable of deconstructing our democracy and undoing the advances we have made in social and economic equality. He wants to pardon the people who attempted to overthrow our government. He wants to legitimize racism and bigotry, and he would relegate women’s rights to where they were in the nineteenth century. His worship of dictators and disdain for our allies could move the Doomsday Clock to midnight as the risk of nuclear war increases.

This is not politics as usual, which itself, can be disturbing to watch. This is a slow-motion revolution whose aim is to change our representative government into an autocratic fascist-like state in which human rights are at the discretion of an insane dictator. If that sounds exaggerated, let me assure you that it’s not. Trump’s debate strategy, demonstrated how far he’s willing to go to achieve his ends. He is a ruthless narcissist with only one goal in mind: his own wealth and power. By contrast, we hear literally thousands of people around the country lauding Biden for his honesty and love of America and its people.

The contrast in personalities, values, morals and ethics isn’t secondary – it’s the point Biden should have been making from the start. We can even read that in Biden’s own words. When he said he only ran for president to protect the nation from Trump in 2020, he meant it. At 81, I ask myself every day why Biden would put himself through this ordeal again. The answer is that the alternative is surrendering to the Devil.

So, Mister President, let me suggest that when you take the debate stage in September, you do what Trump does, only with more class. Apologize to the moderators in advance for ignoring the debate rules. Then, since your staff dropped the ball so badly, let me suggest some opening remarks. Repeat them at every opportunity regardless of what question was asked. Look Trump in the eye and say:

  • You are a despicable human being. You have been found guilty of sexual assault against a helpless woman and fined hundreds of millions of dollars. Your family business has essentially been a criminal operation, for which your CFO, Allan Weiselberg, is now in prison and your company was fined nearly a billion dollars. Your former attorney and fixer, Michael Cohen, served three years in prison for carrying out your illegal orders.
  • You have personally been convicted of thirty-four felonies. With the Supreme Court failing to grant you blanket immunity, and throwing the case back to the lower courts, you have effectively delayed federal trials which could have you incarcerated for the rest of your miserable life until after the election so you can pardon yourself if you win. I promise you this, Donald. During my second term, if the courts so decree, you will see the inside of a prison cell.
  • Your policies are racist. You think Nazis are fine people. You treat women as if their only purpose in life were to provide you with pleasure. You revere murderous dictators but disdain our allies. You praised Vladimir Putin for a brilliant military operation in Ukraine that was one of the worst failures in history, but slander your own generals and the military leaders of NATO. You have no respect for truth, and worst of all, you have no shame. Of all God’s creatures, only humans are capable of shame. What does that say about you?

Joe Biden is not the man he was at 40 or 50. But Franklin Roosevelt led us through the depression and the second world war while transforming our government from one that served oligarchs to one that cared about people – from a wheelchair.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Aftermath of the Debate

Alan Zendell, June 29, 2024

After the horrendous debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, The New York Times editorial board wrote, “To Serve His Country, President Biden should Leave the Race.” The Times wasn’t attacking Biden, it was addressing the greatest fear of the majority Americans – that Biden’s cringeworthy performance at the debate might hand Trump the 2024 election. They and I and hundreds of millions of people in America and nations who have looked to us for leadership since World War 2 believe that would be a disaster for us and the entire world.

What was CNN thinking? Did they imagine the debate would be an airing of serious policies and visions of the future of the United States? We knew from his previous debates that Trump had no interest in such things. He has a unique ability that only a true sociopath could maintain consistently, to twist and distort any forum or attempt to reach a rational conclusion into the sort of chaos he thrives on. The debate proved a number of things, primarily, that it should never have happened. Anyone involved in serious debating knows that debates only work when everyone follows the rules. If the purpose of a debate is to reveal the participants’ ideas and policies, especially when the future of our country depends on them, both parties must take that seriously.

Journalistic media are supposed to disseminate truth, yet they thrive most when someone like Trump is allowed to lie and project his own sick fantasies as reality. Historian Heather Richardson explained that he used a rhetorical technique known as the Gish gallop, “…in which someone throws out a fast string of lies, non-sequiturs, and specious arguments, so many that it is impossible to fact-check or rebut them in the amount of time it took to say them. Trying to figure out how to respond makes the opponent look confused, because they don’t know where to start grappling with the flood that has just hit them.”

That’s what Trump did last Thursday, and it worked. Trump is masterful at manipulating media and using them to his advantage, because both he and the media are essentially about making money. Trump knows sponsors love him because millions of people find him entertaining in the same way they rubberneck on freeways waiting for a glimpse of the gruesome accident that stopped traffic. Trump is effective because the media have no incentive to stop him, and by including a rule that prohibited the debate moderators from challenging the veracity of what spewed from Trump’s mouth, CNN played into his unscrupulous hands.

Trump was so effective at making the president seem confused and addled that many people failed to notice that everything that came out of Trump’s mouth was a lie, that his only purpose on that stage was to make his opponent look weak. That he did so successfully only reinforced the notion that he is unfit to serve. Nothing he said was supported by facts or vetted data. Nothing he said addressed policies or any vision of the future except Trump’s need for retribution. He worsened our concern that he will never accept the results of the election if he loses, and that the January 6th insurrection was only the opening act of a far more sinister future.

All that said, we must accept the reality of Biden’s profound failure to defend himself against Trump’s vicious attacks. We can rail about how unfair and immoral Trump’s behavior is, but in the real world, Trump’s actions might be taken as surrogates for the tactics used by our most dangerous adversaries. Trump made millions of Americans wonder if Biden can stand up to bad actors like Vladimir Putin who make Trump look like a spoiled child. With just over four months until the election, that is the reality never-Trumpers must deal with.

If The Times is right, where do we go from here? Would Kamala Harris naturally inherit the top spot if Biden withdrew? Would she accept the role as Vice President if the Democratic Convention preferred someone else? What happens if more “independent” candidates emerge to attempt to profit from Trump’s chaos? Most important, would voters put off by Biden’s age and burned out by nine years of Trump-style politics just stay home on Election Day?

Take a step back and remember that our priorities are preserving our democracy and assuring that our country is a place where everyone has a chance to thrive and live without war or conflict. Trump is the antithesis of those things. If voters now believe Biden can’t do the job anymore, even if he thinks he can, individual pride and ambition don’t matter.

Let’s hope the Democrats and centrists who care about America have a Plan B. If they conclude that it’s time to hand the reins of a power to a younger generation, my choice is the same as it has been since 2016. It’s time to look seriously at Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) as the best person to lead our country into the post-Trump years.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Conscientious Objection

Alan Zendell, June 25, 2024

In the United States, a conscientious objector is defined as anyone who is opposed to serving in the armed forces and/or bearing arms on the grounds of moral or religious principles. Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights recognizes the right to conscientious objection to military service as a legitimate exercise of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. But as is generally the case with attempts to define universal human rights, individual nations are not obligated to abide by them.

The United States recognized conscientious objector status in both world wars, the Korean conflict, and Vietnam. American pacifists and members of religious groups that oppose war who can prove that their ideology is legitimate have always been exempted from being drafted into the military. I remember the controversy over Muhammed Ali’s conscientious objection to fighting in Vietnam for which he was imprisoned until the Supreme Court overturned his conviction. I also recall the irony of a professional fighter refusing to participate in combat because his religion (Islam) opposed violence.

This has always been an emotionally fraught subject inasmuch as it involves things like patriotism, courage, politics, religion, ideology, and fear. It has also been a major issue in Israel throughout its seventy-six year existence. Israel is a nation that nominally requires mandatory military service from all of its citizens, regardless of gender, but from the outset, its government has exempted ultra-orthodox Jews and all Arab citizens of Israel, including Palestinian Israelis, from serving. Israeli courts have a long history of ruling on such cases, but the issue in Israel today has a distinction that makes it very different.

America’s Constitution specifically provided for separation of Church and State. In theory, at least, churches and other religious organizations that apply for tax exempt status cannot be overtly involved in politics, although Donald Trump’s MAGA movement has aligned itself with something called Christian Nationalism. According to Wikipedia, “Politics in Israel are dominated by Zionist parties. They traditionally fall into three camps, the first two being the largest: Labor Zionism, revisionist Zionism, and religious Zionism. There are also several non-Zionist Orthodox religious parties and non-Zionist secular left-wing groups, as well as non-Zionist and anti-Zionist Israeli Arab parties.”

This is a very significant difference from what Americans are familiar with. Zionism is an international movement to create, support, and defend a homeland in Palestine for Jewish people. As such, it involves politics, diplomacy, religious beliefs and military actions. Unlike in America, there is no separation of Church and State in Israel. Quite the opposite – Israeli politics and the government itself are often dominated by religious views and disagreements. This is problematic because the Israeli political parties dominated by orthodox Jews are also its most hawkish, militant, and anti-Palestinian, and it is these smaller parties that keep Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in power. His right-wing Likud Party can only govern with the support of a coalition that is dominated by groups like orthodox Jews who would rather live in a constant state of war with their Arab and Palestinian neighbors than find a solution that guarantees peaceful coexistence.

We may not like that situation, but it is typical of ethnic and political conflicts that exist around the world, except for one very important difference. The orthodox Jewish Zionists, like the Haredi Jews who constantly beat the drums for war in Israel, also claim the right to be conscientious objectors. They fight tooth and nail to send the IDF to fight, but claim that their religious studies of the Torah exempt them from all military responsibilities. Israeli courts have generally granted exemptions to right-wing Zionists who apply on religious grounds, thus allowing politicians and policy-makers to send their fellow countrymen and women off to war while they stay safe at home.

That may change, however, as the Israeli version of our Supreme Court ruled yesterday that orthodox Jews will no longer be exempted from military service. With the departure of opposition leader Benny Gantz from Netanyahu’s war cabinet, it is now dominated by the Zionist religious parties for whom conscientious objection has been a non-negotiable demand. Netanyahu has been trying to force legislation through his legislature to codify military exemptions for their members to enable him to remain in power.

I wonder if the Zionists’ appetite for war will wane when they face the reality of having to do the fighting themselves. They do not represent the views of the majority of Israelis any more than the MAGA movement represents a majority of Americans. The world is waiting to see whether Netanyahu’s coalition can survive the ruling on conscientious objection, and whether a new coalition that truly represents all of Israel will have a different attitude toward its war in Gaza.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments